I have been sitting at my desk working on writing for 2 straight days. Of course, I slept and ate, but you get the idea.
Anyway… I actually started writing this post when the movie Noah came out, which was back in March. I haven’t had a minute to work on this blog, or any other blog. Life can get very busy.
So, back in March (the week Noah came out), I decided to see the latest and greatest version — you know, Noah, take two!
There’s no denying that Darren Aronofsky’s Bible epic was well-acted. How do you write a bad review about Russell Crowe. It doesn’t happen too often. He’s a great actor, and he played the part of Noah well. That doesn’t mean that I agree with the way Noah’s character was written, because I found it oddly interpreted, but Crowe performed well. He, which is not surprising, really takes on the roll. Most all of the other characters were underdeveloped, and that is another issue in my estimation. Noah himself definitely gets top billing, and somewhat holds the film together. He is in a constant state of revision, flitting between hero to anti-hero almost overnight, when he becomes quite obsessed with the idea that “all humanity,” including his family have entirely missed the mark, will be punished and completely destroyed. Guess he figures he’ll just continue where God leaves off. He will stop at nothing to see that end accomplished too, even if it means destroying one of his kids, and much like Moses, sacrificing one of his own (his sons newborn twins). His poor wife Naameh (Jennifer Connelly), is beside herself, and rightly so. Even more interesting is the antagonist that was added to the story. Tubal-Cain, Noah’s macho-macho man rival defines the word narcissist. It actually becomes almost comical when he manages to break through the middle of the arch and camp out with the animals as a stowaway, and then winning Noah’s son over for a time. I suppose Aronofsky felt the storyline needed some spicing up with the addition of this character and crazy sub-plot, but in no way does this deliver or even make sense.
It’s certainly easy to understand why the Christian community didn’t respond favorably to Noah. It was not even close to accurate — at least, according to the bible. It should be noted, that Noah is a “lose” adaptation, and often times adaptations are changed. However, because Aronofsky makes so many changes, and ads so much fantasy, it’s past the point of believable, and moves into being just plain weird. From the mystical, expanding earth that moves through the audience through time in an instant, to the “Watchers,” the dark, sci-fi creatures that sound like Darth Vader remnants, it leaves one with the feeling that they are on an exhausting adventure ride at Disneyland. Even popcorn didn’t appease.
No doubt, the ark is impressive, and watching every creature surge toward the arch two by two, is fairly entertaining. Aronofsky doesn’t just use biblical text as his source; there is quite a potpourri from various religions, which includes: pre-Christian paganism, the Quran, Greek mythology, the Big Bang theory, and other literary works. Also, I don’t think Noah and his famiglia were sporting English accents either, and most all of the main characters seemed to miss out on the fact that this takes place pre Great Britain (haha, actually pre-much of anything!).
In addition to the screenplay having poorly developed characters, Aronofsky taking near-laughable creative liberties, and a conglomeration of elements (as if pulled out of a hat), this action, sci-fi, epic adventure was grossly over-written. By the end of this big screen fiasco, I found myself sitting in the darkened theater shaking my head and asking myself, “What happened?”